The main reason "we" cannot combine

... is to be found in the Far Left framing of the language

The Latin for Left is sinister, until recently they called themselves Woke … until “we” made it a pejorative … then they framed a term “far right” which is essentially meaningless but that is what their HQ runs with from the shadows, fed down to every key position holder in the west and unquestioningly obeyed.

They are highly organised, infinitely funded by dirty money, they have captured principals, teaching staff and therefore children … they are, essentially, monsters.

And this is where “we” are (taken from UHC-HQ Sunday 1c and 2):

The ‘far left’ describes the brainwashed, the karens, the Wokerati if you like, of coloured hair, with words like “racist” and “far right” tripping off their tongues at anyone or anything they don’t like.

They include all western royalty, clown politicians, key placeholders in all fields from the judiciary to the media to education … it was mooted in 1954 in the US Senate by Sen William Jenner and by the perps themselves. They control most political “normies” in the west, plus Uniparty supporters who dtill think voting LibLabConGreen still buys anything.

But are they, combined, the majority by numbers in each western nation? Well, we do need to factor in the deathculters here in percentages … I saw one figure of 70% of the population of Birmingham, England, being deathculter … who knows in London?

Plus Indians, not as many Chinese and Jewish.

And “us”? Who are “we”? The term I use, being used around 2010 by some pundits, was “unherdable cats”, cats being an internet conceit of the time.

It’s a good description of all of “us” … we are simply dissidents against far left Wokery but we ourselves can be anything from ex Tory to Old Labour to just disgruntled voters who don’t like what we’re seeing. Some are Christian, most are secular … it’s a big tent. And we’re quite “unherdable”, let’s face up to this fact of life. We are the non-compliant.

Ah, but are we? What would we actually do to help stop this juggernaut?

And what number of us are there? Well, Labour “won” with from 16.9% to 25.5% of the eligible vote, inc. deathculters and Indians. But that does not mean that around 80% were combinable in order to sweep the enemy into the sea … “disparate” is a far better word for us, with shades of opinion from centre middle class to a maybe truer “far right” end.

One end of that spectrum would shun the other end.

Therein lies our tragedy. The enemy agenda is clear enough, from the Masonic to the Fabian to the Kalergi … destruction of western society and all trad supporters of it. They are highly uni-ideological, spouting the same buzz and weasel words and phrases, they’re increasingly more violent, they’re essentially captured and insane … there is zero dialogue with them. Lucis would be proud of them.

Yesterday, I posted seven examples of how they, the far-left, identify a truth and then tell the diametric opposite of it, with a straight face and utter impunity (UHC-HQ Saturday 16). Plus insanity and low moral compass.

This is what the bewildered, angry, raped and otherwise-attacked in the west are up against. I did another post at Orphans of Liberty on two chaps’ ideas for how to get around it … one is American and one a Brit.

Will there be all in violence, conflagration and slaughter in the streets, in our homes? Well, it’s started in tester form, hasn’t it? Or will the population meekly succumb to the digital ID and all the other tools of enslavement?

Or will we end up as the Eloi in the time machine, suspended from cliff face communities or from Morlock meathooks?